Not the same.

送交者: gyro 于 2009-09-02, 12:44:37:

回答: 请别玩三级跳，照顾一下非哲学人士。还是请先把“聚焦”问题由 @ 于 2009-09-02, 12:38:04:

The focusing process of science selects the research topics, but what is found is "real" in the usual sense. Only that a lot of interesting stuff is excluded from the research sight by the scientific methods.

I have nothing to say about the focusing of the other sort.

所有跟贴:

can't the scientific methods of the focusing process - @ (227 bytes) 2009-09-02, 13:04:15 (361489)
- That is happening all the time - gyro (104 bytes) 2009-09-02, 13:12:39 (361491)
  - 果如此，可不可以这样看呢：科学发现的球越大，其和未知的 - @ (12 bytes) 2009-09-02, 13:31:56 (361494)
    - The way I said it - gyro (168 bytes) 2009-09-02, 15:49:48 (361520)
    - 瞧你，一用这个熟知的比喻，那么高深的话题被你庸俗了 - gyro (59 bytes) 2009-09-02, 13:35:48 (361495)
      - As long as it works, never changes。 - @ (78 bytes) 2009-09-02, 13:48:12 (361497)
        
        我从来不否定哲学的价值，至少可以看作是一种艺术。但像田野那样 - @ (187 bytes) 2009-09-02, 14:11:17 (361498)
thx. (无内容) - @ (0 bytes) 2009-09-02, 12:57:42 (361485)
- thx. (无内容) - gyro (0 bytes) 2009-09-02, 13:01:17 (361488)

加跟贴